The West London Tube Station Conundrum

Turnham Green Church on one cold and creepy foggy January evening.

Greetings humanoids!

One of the things that has intrigued me for quite a while is this strange supernatural phenomenon that seems to have befallen West London decades ago but no one seems to care / give a ‘flying lizard humping a crab in the air’ about. Allow me to elaborate…

I have been inhabiting this part of Londinium for long enough now to know what airline is hovering above my head purely based on the time of the day and sound of the engine (and I pseudo-support a 3rd Heathrow runway). And this breadth of experience as a West Londoner, as handy as it is in day to day life, means that I do indeed spend most the time in the shower thinking of this particular conundrum.

Keep this map as a reference, you’ll need it as I ramble along (click on each place-mark for more info).

Let us start from the beginning and introduce several lemmas directly correlating to the map above.

Lemma 1: Turnham Green station was named after Tunham Green the park
Lemma 2: Chiswick Park station was named after Chiswick Common
Lemma 3: Chiswick Park the business park (a dystopian Orwellian-esque village like place), was name after Chiswick Park station
Lemma 4: Gunnersbury station was named after Gunnersbury Park

Now according to a Freedom of information request by some awesome individual back in 2008, Tfl responded with this extremely informative spreadsheet outlining the distance between every two outstanding stations on all ‘London Underground’ lines. Couple that with my out of this orbit spreadsheet data skills, I was able to calculate the average distance between any two stations on the same line, and it turned out to be 1.31km (0.81 miles).

District Line – West London

If we were to follow the natural sequence of stations on the two branches of the district lines (picture above), it would go like this:

Ealing Broadway branch (westbound w/ distance):


Richmond Branch (westbound w/ distance):


Taking into consideration the average distance mentioned above it would seem that the distance between Turnham Green and Chiswick Park is indeed rather strange, could it be that Chiswick Park was never meant to be there? Was it a fluke?

The station was opened in July 1879 whereas Turnham Green station came 10 years before that in 1869!

Confused? So am I. Let’s solve this b*tch:

It turns out that it was not ‘Turnham Green’ that is at fault for causing all this solid and extremely life changing confusion. It was actually ‘Chiswick Park’, which in it’s early days was actually named ‘Acton Green’, in reference to the adjacent park. Taking into consideration that Turnham Green was the only station serving the area 10 years earlier, it just made a whole lot of sense that it was named after what then was the closest church and park (because people have like little imagination sometimes).

Gunnersbury Manor

This brings us to our final piece of the puzzle, Gunnersbury. This was quite strange, because for quite a while it was evident to everyone living on the west side of Chiswick that Gunnersbury was really the park and the park took it’s name after the manor (later turned museum) on the site. So how can a park, roughly a mile away, closer to Acton Town and Kew Bridge give its name to Gunnersbury? The answer is we just don’t know, but what is now known is that the station actually opened as ‘Brentford Road station’, in a clear reference to what is now Chiswick High Street which on a straight path will probably take you straight to Brentford (or Sao Paolo, if you make it to Heathrow and sneak on a plane).

So there you go my minions, hours spent in the shower, flying my own rocket and even cleaning my own dishes pondering over this conundrum have finally yielded a result. Eureka!

Edit (February 2016): I have now moved away from West London to somewhere else (no longer sharing due to fear of Tim Cook giving my location data away). As such I am no longer an expert on all things West London and would not recommend you take the analysis above as conclusive. In 4 years, Chiswick has probably changed (right?) and so everything above makes no sense. Whatever.


The World in Heathrow’s Eyes

Heathrow marketing - You're either a Customer or Opportunity!

As I was making a journey on the London Underground today I was struck by an unbelievably patronizing map ad by Heathrow. Apparently the new aggressive Heathrow marketing strategy is to highlight the fact that everywhere/everyone else on earth other than the UK is actually one of two:

1- Customers

2- Opportunity

I say this wreaks of utter self centrist stench! It would seem that the aim is to pressure the government into crafting a much more Heathrow friendly aviation policy that would put Heathrow back on the global map. As demonstrated by the Heathrow marketing team in this rather traditionally British Euro-phobic video below, France and Germany are one up the UK because of their aviation policies. The British Chamber of Commerce’s recent recommendations back that up with a call for a third runway at Heathrow amid Labour’s new shift to overturn its previous support for the same plan.

But Heathrow aren’t using the T word just yet, instead they’re relying on heavy usage of the word “growth” in an attempt to make it work both ways.

I’ve personally always been of the thinking that Heathrow cannot compete realistically without a third runway. I am sorry my environmental friends, I too despise Heathrow’s complete lack of regard to its surroundings, but from a purely business sense, I “understand” why it might be needed. Heathrow at one point had six, only to scale back because of growth needs and lack of spacing. But a third runway is highly unlikely any time soon, the best Heathrow can hope for is a more lenient government policy regarding frequency of flights and even potentially bringing back night flights (after 1AM). For now they’re going to try out using both runways simultaneously for four months, even though the cap of  480,000 flights a year would hold.

WW1 propaganda - Lets fight these dogs!

But regardless of how strong or weak their point is, they cannot seriously expect anyone to support them if they’re going to go with marketing plots that resemble more a WWI propaganda map poster than anything else in the 21st century! Surely! Right?!